• Home
  • About Emmy-Winning Blog
  • ©2008-2023 Scott W. Smith (Contact Info)

Screenwriting from Iowa

…and Other Unlikely Places

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Chaplin on Embracing Clichés
Orson Welles at USC in 1981 (Part 1) »

Happy, Sad, Ironic & Ambiguous Endings (Tip 88)

January 4, 2014 by Scott W. Smith

“A good ending must be decisive, set-up, and inevitable—but nonetheless unexpected.”
Screenwriter Terry Rossio
Wordplayer, The Big Finish

“Endings, frankly, are a bitch.”
Two-time Oscar winning screenwriter William Goldman
Adventures in the Screen Trade

In yesterday’s post Chaplin on Clichés I mentioned the only four choices to conclude your screenplay were “a happy ending, a sad ending, an ambiguous ending, or an ironic ending.” And while that’s true of probably 99.9% of all films I realized that there is another rarely used option. Just as there are cross-genre movies, I believe there are a few movies that have mixed endings.

First let’s recap the cross or mixed genre angle. A good example would be The Rocky Horror Picture Show (1975) —it’s a horror film, a comedy, and a musical. Quentin Tarantino’s vast film knowledge may make him the master of cross breeding genres. Django Unchained is part historical drama, part western, part comedy, part action, part love story—part something else when Tarantino drops in the ’70s Jim Croce song in at a pivotal point in the film which he also directed.

Tarantino pulled it off and walked away with the Oscar for writing Django Unchained. So mixing things up can be good.

But it’s easier to mix genres than endings. In the Robert Zemeckis directed film Cast Away Tom Hanks stars as a Fed Ex executive who becomes a modern-day Robinson Crusoe when a plane crash leaves him stranded on a deserted island. It’s the film that came to mind as a film with a mix of endings. (Maybe it doesn’t—maybe it’s more an example of a couple false endings.) First let me define what I mean by happy, sad, ironic and ambiguous endings:

Happy: The Graduate, The Shawshank Redemption, It’s a Wonderful Life: Up endings where the guy gets the girl, there’s freedom in paradise, the shark’s killed, and/or order restored.
Sad: The Perfect Storm, Chinatown, Buried: Down endings, often where a key protagonist dies. And in some cases with injustice or evil prevailing. Sometimes what’s stated is just the hard realities of life, other times leaning toward nihilism (life has no meaning) as director Ingmar Bergam once said,” We are trapped in the senseless illusion of human history and we realize at the end that all hope is gone.” (Often found in art  house and foreign films). And yet a sad or down ending can be like a greek tragedy serving as a cautionary tale like Death of a Salesman (Don’t spend your life climbing the wrong ladder).
Ironic: Rocky, Toy Story 3, Silence of the Lambs: This is the core of many great endings. It’s where the hero doesn’t get their intended goal, but gains something greater. Or they get their goal, but lose something else. Rocky loses the fight, but gets the girl and gains self-esteem. Clarice gets the serial killer Buffalo Bill, but psychopath Hannibal escapes. Jack saves Rose’s life in Titanic, but sacrifces his life in the process.
Ambiguous: Memento, The Wrestler, 2001 A Space Odyssey: The “chose your own adventure” of the group. You decide what happened to the characters.  Filmmakers of ambiguous endings tend to say things like, “I think it’s best if audiences bring their own conclusion to what happened to the main characters.” Many times the audiences just walks out confused.  (Tough endings at the box office, but in a few cases where audiences go back to a film again hoping to figure the film  can result in a healthy box office. But most times audiences are still just as confused as they were at the ending to the TV show LOST.)

So how was Cast Away a mixed ending? (At least the movie could have ended at any of these points.)
Happy: Tom Hanks’ character survives years on the deserted island…
Sad:  But discovers his fiancé is now married with children (Bummer).
Ironic: But it turns out that they still have deep feelings for each other and end up kissing. (This whole sequence is filled with emotions and very well done.) Sitting in his old jeep he tells his one time fiancé (Helen Hunt) that’s “It’s time to go home.” And just we think they’re going to ride off into the sunset (even though it’s at night and raining),  he pulls into her driveway and sends her back to her replacement family. They love each other but they can’t be together.  His goal of reuniting with the woman he loves is crushed. But he’s grateful for that love because that hope of being with her kept him alive all those years he fought for survival on the deserted island.
Ambiguous: Now what’s he going to do? Where’s he going to go? There’s a blimp of hope that he’ll end up with the artist who the audience was introduced to at the beginning of the film because he has a package to deliver to her at the end of the film. But she’s not home so he leaves the package and a note. So where’s he going to go now? His jeep sits at a four-way intersection in the middle of remote Texas and this is what happens:

The angel wings on the back of the truck tell Hanks that’s the artist he just dropped the package off for. I believe most people in the audience are begging Hanks to at least explore that option. Zemeckis, Boyles, Hanks, and every executive at Twentieth Century Fox had to know that’s what the audience wanted. They may have even shot the scene where after some contemplation he at least heads his Jeep down the dirt road toward the angel wing women’s house. I think that’s how Chaplin would have ended it.

“I’m not afraid of doing a cliché, if it’s right. We don’t wade through our existence with any sort of originality. We all live and die and eat three meals a day, and fall in and out of love, and the rest of it. So people say, that’s been done before. So what? In avoiding clichés I think one can become dull.”
Charlie Chaplin

Which way does he go? This is the last sentence from Boyles’ screenplay from Cast Away—The Shooting Script:

“It doesn’t really matter which way he goes. At some point in life’s grand journey you just have to let go of the oars and have faith. His new life begins…now. The end is just the beginning.”

The last shot fades out on a close-up of Hanks contemplating where to go next. My guess is Zemeckis and Broyles decided end on ambiguity–to avoid the happy ending cliché. I thought they already did a great job avoiding cliché by having his fiancé be married.

Cast Away screenwriter William Broyles  Jr. later said, “Chucks’s first words of dialogue in the movie is ‘time.’ Time runs his life and for six years time ran our lives as we made this movie. His last words are ‘thank you,’ an expression of gratitude which defines his transformation.” Intellectually I think he’s 100% correct. Dramatically he has taken the Hanks character on a classic journey where he returned a better man.  But emotionally is where ambiguous endings often falls short.

Would Hanks at least getting in his Jeep and heading down the dirt road toward the artist have been, to borrow Michael Arndt’s words, an Insanely Great Ending? (Insanely Great = positive & surprising and meaningful.) We’ll never know. But I did find a version of the script (marked 3rd draft) where Hanks’ character ends up in a remote area talking to (ironically) a Fed Ex driver named Erica.

                     ERICA
          What brings you out to the sticks?

                     CHUCK
          Had a package to deliver.

                     ERICA
          You?  Personally?

                     CHUCK
          I had it on the island with me.

                     ERICA
          Must be a story there.

There's a connection building here, effortlessly.

EXT.  BEACH - MOMENTS LATER

We are wide on the beach, watching the truck move along the
water, kicking up wisps of sand.

                     CHUCK (V.O.)
          Yeah, a long one.

                     ERICA (V.O.)
          I've got lots of time.

                     CHUCK (V.O.)
          So do I.

The truck goes down the beach and then turns inland, away
from the ocean.  Away from all that.

                     CHUCK (V.O.)
          So do I.

And we pull back, taking in the sweep of the beach, the
estuaries, and the green forest stretching back into America.

The end is the beginning.

A little less ambiguous.  It took six years to make Cast Away and it would be fascinating to learn how the filmmakers wrestled with the ending during that time. 
Update 1/6/14: I wondered if I could find any movie critics addressing the Cast Away ending and found this Stephen Holden quote from the NY Times: 
"Because the conflict between romantic convention and the movie's angst is never resolved, 'Cast Away' leaves us hanging. But that final, lurking ambiguity is a small price to pay for the primal force of what has come before."

P.S. I believe it's on the 20th Anniversary DVD of The Shawshank Redemption where writer/director Frank Darabont said he wanted to end Shawshank simply by having the Morgan Freeman character being freed from prison and riding off on a bus. Fade to black. Ambiguous. But the producers pushed for him to at least shoot a sequence where Red and Andy are reunited on a beautiful island paradise. The ending the audience yearned for. The ending that was set-up in the script. Darabont basically said that if they would have used his ambiguous ending Shawshank would not be the highly regarded film it is today and he wouldn't be doing a 2oth anniversary commentary.  

Related post: Insanely Great Endings (Part 2) Michael Arndt makes the case for knowing your ending first.

Scott  W. Smith

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Tumblr
  • Pinterest

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in screenwriting tips |

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 1,356 other subscribers
  • Screenwriting from Iowa…and Other Unlikely Places

    Screenwriting from Iowa…and Other Unlikely Places
  • @scottwsmith_com

    • RT @thembob: Here are some screenwriting numbers: My 8th script sold but was never made. My 12th & 17th scripts were optioned but never m… 6 days ago
    Follow @scottwsmith_com
  • Top Posts

    • John Ford's Advice to Spielberg
    • Objective Correlative (Tip #48)
    • ‘Torture your heroes’—How to Write a Movie via Craig Mazin
    • Why Movie Stars Have Big Heads
    • The Devil Speech by James L. Brooks
    • Screenwriter Craig Mazin on Thematic Structure—Plus 12 Conflicting Views on Theme
    • The Perfect Logline
    • Happy, Sad, Ironic & Ambiguous Endings (Tip 88)
    • The Major or Central Dramatic Question (Tip #101)
    • Inside the ‘Breaking Bad’ Writers' Room & How Bad Ideas Can Lead to Good Ideas
  • Recent Posts

    • Casey Neistat’s YouTube Success in Just One Word
    • ‘Everything needs to be edited…’—Jerry Seinfeld
    • Celebrating 15 Years of Writing the ‘Screenwriting from Iowa… and Other Unlikely Place’ Blog By Boiling the Essence of Screenwriting—Maybe Life—Down to Just 15 Words
    • Postcard #225 (El Raton Theatre in New Mexico)
    • Lessons Learned from Pelé, Barbara Walters, and the Dumbest Thing I Ever Did on a Production
  • Pages

    • About Emmy-Winning Blog
    • ©2008-2023 Scott W. Smith (Contact Info)
  • Categories

    • Book Reviews
    • Film History
    • filmmaking
    • Filmmaking Quote of the Day
    • Miscellaneous
    • Most Viewed Posts
    • Movies
    • Off Screen Quotes
    • podcasting
    • Postcards
    • Quotes from the Road
    • Screenwriters
    • screenwriting
    • Screenwriting & Life
    • Screenwriting Biz
    • Screenwriting Quotes
    • Screenwriting Road Trips
    • screenwriting tips
    • Television
    • Video Blog
    • writing
    • Writing Quotes
    • YouTube Content Creating
  • Add to Technorati Favorites
  • Digg!
  • Archives

    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015
    • August 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • August 2014
    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • October 2012
    • September 2012
    • August 2012
    • July 2012
    • June 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
  • Meta

    • Register
    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.com
  • RSS Screenwriting from Iowa

    • Casey Neistat’s YouTube Success in Just One Word
      Today is February 1, 2023 and I’m going to start a string of post on YouTubing. Where does one start? Hard to go wrong with YouTuber and filmmaker Casey Neistat. Last May I took his online class on YouTube and throughly enjoyed it. I produced two videos in a few weeks. (I haven’t posted them […]
      Scott W. Smith
  • Blogroll—Favorite Posts from Others

    • ASPIRING TO ACT, WRITE, DIRECT—TomCruise.com
    • BURN IT DOWN—John August
    • CASE STUDIES IN FILM EDITING—Oliver Peters
    • DAVID MAMET'S MEMO— Movieline
    • EVERY SALE HAS A STORY—Blake Snyder
    • FILM FINACE OVERWHELM—Stacy Parks
    • IT'S THE CONCEPT STUPID—Max Adams
    • LISTEN TO A MOVIE—Scott Myers
    • MISHA GREEN INTERVIEW—Scriptshadow
    • QUERY LETTER SAMPLE — Michele Wallerstein
    • RAIDERS OF THE LOST ARK—Scriptsnotes, Ep 73:
    • THE 'RAIDERS' STORY CONFERENCE—Mystery Man on Film
    • THE "A" LIST—Christopher Lockhart
    • THE SCREENWRITER'S GUIDE TO MOVIE VILLAINS—Screenwriting Spark
    • THE TOTAL FILM-MAKER BY JERRY LEWIS—Cinephilla and Beyond
    • VINCENT LAFORET—chasejarvisLIVE

Blog at WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


  • Follow Following
    • Screenwriting from Iowa
    • Join 1,356 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Screenwriting from Iowa
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
%d bloggers like this: